Careless talk costs careers

The recently published judgment in Forz Khan v Bar Standards Board provides insight into the professional consequences of careless talk and use of LinkedIn. It comes hot on the heels of an SDT judgment in Deborah Daniels who was prosecuted by SRA for making a series of Tweets that were offensive and which expressed hostility towards Islam, Catholicism and Judaism.

The two are completely unconnected but yet again lawyers have been professionally sanctioned for inappropriate communications. The only real surprise is that despite clear professional obligations that have been around for quite some time, they took place.

Read more

SRA – new focus on “principles” not “rules”

The SRA is focussing on ‘principles’ and ‘professional judgement’ as opposed to ‘rules’ A principle based system is more uncertain than fixed rules and therefore it is more important to legal practices to have a set of recorded systems and controls in place that are applied consistently across the firm. The rules are clear particularly … Read more

Data Processors and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Data Protection
Whether you are a Data Controller or a Data Processor you have responsibilities under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). A controller determines the purposes and means of processing personal data, whereas a processor is responsible for processing personal data on behalf of a controller and you are required to maintain records of personal data and processing activities.

Read more

Verified by ExactMetrics